Re: [PATCH 1/3] revoke: misc fixes

[Nick Piggin]

Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > Could you try something like walk the i_mmap lists to find mms with vmas that
> > haven't need revoking, then each time you find one, take a ref on the mm, drop
> > i_mmap_lock, take mmap_sem, and walk all its vmas looking for any that
> > reference the inode?
>
>
> Yes, that would work. What I am cooking up now is dropping 
> ->i_mmap_lock, restarting the scan after each revoke_vma() and skipping 
> vmas that are VM_REVOKED.

Of course you can't take a reference to a vma, so to pin a vma you need
the mmap_sem, and to do that you need to drop i_mmap_lock, which means
your vma might go away ;)

So I think you really do need to get back to the mm, and then search its
vmas.

Also, a down_write_trylock attempt inside i_mmap_lock should be a valid
optimisation.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/