Re: [PATCH] splice: partial write handling fix

From: Dmitriy Monakhov
Date: Thu Mar 15 2007 - 09:46:26 EST


Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 14 2007, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
>> currently if partial write has happened while ->commit_write() then page
>> wasn't marked as accessed and rebalanced.
>
> The ->commit_write() return values aren't very well designed imho. Is
> your fix correct getting the pipe_to_file() return value correct now?
I think yes, after my patch this path look like follows:

ret = mapping->a_ops->commit_write(file, page, offset, offset+this_len);
if (ret) {
if(ret == AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE) {
page_cache_release(page);
goto find_page;
}
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
/*
* Partial write has happened, so 'ret' already initialized by
* number of bytes written, Where is nothing we have to do here.
*/
} else
ret = this_len;
/*
* Return the number of bytes written and mark page as
* accessed, we are now done!
*/
mark_page_accessed(page);
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(mapping);
out:
page_cache_release(page);
unlock_page(page);
out_ret:
return ret;
}

But off corse this patch does't fix issues spotted by Nick.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/