Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

[Pavel Machek]

On Fri 2007-03-02 11:47:47, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:40:23PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> > Whitelist seems like a way to go :(.
> 
> The DSDT code clearly can't touch the hardware itself - hardware access 
> is carried out by the kernel. If we can identify cases where ACPI reads 
> and writes would touch resources claimed by other drivers, that would be 
> a good starting point for working out what's going on.
> 
> Of course, this ignores the case where the DSDT just traps into SMM 
> code. That one is clearly unsolvable.

We can't solve SMM stuff. (Whitelist needed :-).

Actually for the acpi stuff... we might wrap ACPI interpretter with a
semaphore that needs to be taken before starting any AML code. Then
just make sure sensors take same semaphore?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/