Re: [PATCH 1/5] Lumpy Reclaim V3

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Wed Feb 28 2007 - 13:14:51 EST


On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Andy Whitcroft wrote:

> +static int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int active)
> +{
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (PageLRU(page) && (PageActive(page) == active)) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + if (likely(get_page_unless_zero(page))) {
> + /*
> + * Be careful not to clear PageLRU until after we're
> + * sure the page is not being freed elsewhere -- the
> + * page release code relies on it.
> + */
> + ClearPageLRU(page);
> + ret = 0;

Is that really necessary? PageLRU is clear when a page is freed right?
And clearing PageLRU requires the zone->lru_lock since we have to move it
off the LRU.

> - ClearPageLRU(page);
> - target = dst;
> + active = PageActive(page);

Why are we saving the active state? Page cannot be moved between LRUs
while we hold the lru lock anyways.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/