Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH 2.6.20 1/1] fbdev, mm: hecuba/E-Inkfbdev driver

[James Simmons]

> I'm not sure I understand. What the current implementation does is to
> use host based framebuffer memory. Apps mmap that memory and draw to
> that. Then after the delay, that framebuffer is written to the
> device's memory. That's the scenario for hecubafb where the Apollo
> controller maintains it's own internal framebuffer.
> 
> When you say without the framebuffer, if you meant without the host
> memory, then this method doesn't work. If you mean without the
> device's internal memory, then yes, I think we can do that, because it
> would be up to the driver to use the touched pagelist to then perform
> IO as suitable for its device.

I meant for it to work for non framebuffer devices. I realized that not 
such a great idea.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/