Re: Fix soft lockup with iSeries viocd driver

From: Tony Breeds
Date: Tue Feb 27 2007 - 18:42:52 EST


On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:33:34PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:

> It looks ok (better than end_request()), though it would still be nice
> to properly end requests. See the recent thread on the lguest block
> driver.

Hi Jens,
I read through the lguest thread and came up with the patch
below, I hope I understood correctly. We still need to do the check to
make sure we ask for at least one sector to be processed in
end_that_request_first(), as the request that triggers the lockup here
(an sg_io ioctl in this case), has both req->hard_nr_sectors and
req->hard_cur_sectors = 0.

From: Tony Breeds <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Fix soft lockup with iSeries viocd driver, caused by eventually calling
end_that_request_first() with nr_bytes 0.

The lockup is triggered by hald, interrogating the device.

Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
viocd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.20-rc5/drivers/cdrom/viocd.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc5.orig/drivers/cdrom/viocd.c
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc5/drivers/cdrom/viocd.c
@@ -376,6 +376,25 @@ static int send_request(struct request *
return 0;
}

+static void viocd_end_request(struct request *req, int uptodate)
+{
+ int nsectors = req->hard_nr_sectors;
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure it's fully ended, and ensure that we process
+ * at least one sector.
+ */
+ if (blk_pc_request(req))
+ nsectors = (req->data_len + 511) >> 9;
+ if (!nsectors)
+ nsectors = 1;
+
+ if (end_that_request_first(req, uptodate, nsectors))
+ BUG();
+ add_disk_randomness(req->rq_disk);
+ blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
+ end_that_request_last(req, uptodate);
+}

static int rwreq;

@@ -385,11 +404,11 @@ static void do_viocd_request(request_que

while ((rwreq == 0) && ((req = elv_next_request(q)) != NULL)) {
if (!blk_fs_request(req))
- end_request(req, 0);
+ viocd_end_request(req, 0);
else if (send_request(req) < 0) {
printk(VIOCD_KERN_WARNING
"unable to send message to OS/400!");
- end_request(req, 0);
+ viocd_end_request(req, 0);
} else
rwreq++;
}
@@ -601,9 +620,9 @@ return_complete:
"with rc %d:0x%04X: %s\n",
req, event->xRc,
bevent->sub_result, err->msg);
- end_request(req, 0);
+ viocd_end_request(req, 0);
} else
- end_request(req, 1);
+ viocd_end_request(req, 1);

/* restart handling of incoming requests */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&viocd_reqlock, flags);





Yours Tony

linux.conf.au http://linux.conf.au/ || http://lca2008.linux.org.au/
Jan 28 - Feb 02 2008 The Australian Linux Technical Conference!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/