Re: [PATCH] udivdi3: 64 bit divide

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:24:37 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:35:17 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The kernel already has several implmentations and usages of 64 by 64 
> > bit divide.
> > 
> > Although it is significantly slower, there are places that need it so
> > provide one generic version using scaling, and allow existing platform
> > versions to continue.
> 
> The reason we implement 64/32 via do_div() is, for better or for worse, to
> make people think before they use it.  And to make it stand out, and so
> that we discover places that are using it by accident, where they could use
> something cheaper.
> 
> However your implementation of the presumably even more expensive 64/64
> allows us to do 64/64 with a plain old "/" operator.
> 
> If the do_div() philosophy is any good then we should surely repeat it for
> 64/64, no?
> 

Then we should pull the existing udivdi3 implementations?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/