Re: [RFC] Fast assurate clock readable from user space and NMIhandler

From: Daniel Walker
Date: Tue Feb 27 2007 - 05:22:09 EST


On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 02:38 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

>
> I am concerned about the automatic fallback to the PIT when no other
> clock source is available. A clocksource read would be atomic when TSC
> or HPET are available, but would fall back on PIT otherwise. There
> should be some way to specify that a caller is only interested in atomic
> clock sources (if none are available, the call should simply return an
> error, or 0).
>
> I still think that an RCU style update mechanism would be a good way to
> fix the current clocksource read issue. Another, slower and non NMI
> safe way to do this would be with a read seqlock and with IRQ disabling.

I'm not sure what you mean by using the RCU, but the pit clocksource
does disable interrupts with a spin_lock_irqsave().

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/