Re: [PATCH 04/44 take 2] [UBI] kernel-spce API header

[Artem Bityutskiy]

Greg KH wrote:
> Are you sure this is the proper license for new kernel code coming from
> IBM these days?  You might want to go verify that the "or any later
> version" is allowed right now...

Hi Greg,

you advised me to use the "class" sysfs category which I did. But I've 
read at LWN that there is a long-term plan to get rid of this category 
altogether. So may I ask you the same question I asked some time ago.

UBI works on top of MTD devices. MTD device may perfectly well support 
the device/driver/bus model. But how this model does not really fit UBI 
because we have no bus.

Please, advice me, should I keep using the "class" category which seems 
fine for me or should I use the device/driver/bus stuff? What do I do 
with bus then? I tried this some time ago and things did not work with 
NULL bus.

Thanks,
Artem.

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÑÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/