Re: [PATCH 18/29] netfilter: notify about NF_QUEUE vs emergency skbs

[Patrick McHardy]

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 17:17 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
> 
>>I don't really see why
>>queueing is special though, dropping the packets in the ruleset
>>will break things just as well, as will routing them to a blackhole.
>>I guess the user just needs to be smart enough not to do this.
> 
> 
> Its user-space and no emergency packet may rely on user-space because it
> most likely is needed to maintain user-space.

I believe I might have misunderstood the intention of this patch.

Assuming the user is smart enough not to queue packets destined
to a SOCK_VMIO socket, are you worried about unrelated packets
allocated from the emergency reserve not getting freed fast
enough because they're sitting in a queue? In that case simply
dropping the packets would be fine I guess.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/