Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions

From: Aaron Sethman
Date: Sat Jan 13 2007 - 15:56:39 EST



On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:

On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:51:36PM +0100, Damien Wyart wrote:
* Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> [070113 08:11]:
This still leaves the old regressions we have not yet fixed...
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19.

Subject : BUG: scheduling while atomic: hald-addon-stor/...
cdrom_{open,release,ioctl} in trace
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/26/105
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/29/22
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/31/133
Submitter : Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx>
Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@xxxxxxx>
Aaron Sethman <androsyn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Status : unknown

I have not seen the problem since using rc3, so I guess it is ok now.
Maybe the commit 9414232fa0cc28e2f51b8c76d260f2748f7953fc has fixed the
problem, but I am not 100% sure.

Thanks for this information.

Jon, Aaron, can you confirm it's fixed in -rc5?

I haven't seen it in a while anyways, fwiw.

-Aaron
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/