Re: O_DIRECT question

[Linus Torvalds]

On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> Yeah *smallish* higher order allocations are fine, and we use them all the
> time for things like stacks or networking.
> 
> But Aubrey (who somehow got removed from the cc list) wants to do order 9
> allocations from userspace in his nommu environment. I'm just trying to be
> realistic when I say that this isn't going to be robust and a userspace
> solution is needed.

I do agree that order-9 allocations simply is unlikely to work without 
some pre-allocation notion or some serious work at active de-fragmentation 
(and the page cache is likely to be the _least_ of the problems people 
will hit - slab and other kernel allocations are likely to be much much 
harder to handle, since you can't free them in quite as directed a 
manner).

But for smallish-order (eg perhaps 3-4 possibly even more if you are 
careful in other places), the page cache limiter may well be a "good 
enough" solution in practice, especially if other allocations can be 
controlled by strict usage patterns (which is not realistic in a general- 
purpose kind of situation, but might be realistic in embedded).

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/