Re: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3)

[Adrian Bunk]

On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:21:23AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> > > >Subject    : BUG: at fs/inotify.c:172 set_dentry_child_flags()
> > > >References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7785
> > > >Submitter  : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@xxxxxxxx>
> > > >Handled-By : John McCutchan <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >Status     : problem is being debugged
> > > I'm not sure that this is actually a regression for 2.6.20-rc.
> > The submitter says it doesn't occur in 2.6.19.
> 
> Any chance that the submitter could do git bisect? (added to CC). From the 
> bugzilla entry it seems to be well reproducible for him.

That's a possible but time intensive approach for this kind of bug.

I'd expect bisecting such an "at least 1 times a day" bug to take at 
about one month.

And that's not a high number, that's a realistic estimate considering 
that you have to test a dozen kernels and verifying that a kernel is 
good takes 2-3 days.

> Jiri Kosina

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/