Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface

[Avi Kivity]

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I still think that in the long term, we should migrate to
> new system calls and a special file system for kvm, which
> might be non-mountable. 

The inode-per-vm and inode-per-vcpu approach sort-of-implies a 
nonmountable special filesystem, so with the proposed change, we'll be 
halfway there.



--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/