Re: [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface

[Avi Kivity]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Can we please avoid adding a ton of new ioctls?  ioctls inevitably 
> require 64-bit compat code for certain architectures, whereas 
> sysfs/procfs does not.

I don't see how the procfs or sysfs models fit kvm.  wrt compat code, 
the current kvm abi (also ioctl based) is 32/64 bit safe without compat 
code, and I certainly don't intend to break it.


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/