Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 1/2] sata_promise: TX2plus PATA support

[Jeff Garzik]

Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> This patch implements a simple way of setting up per-port
> flags on the SATA+PATA Promise TX2plus chips, which is a
> prerequisite for supporting the PATA port on those chips.
>
> It is based on the observation that ap->flags isn't really
> used until after ->port_start() has been invoked. So it
> places the "exceptional" per-port flags array in the driver's
> private host structure, and uses it in ->port_start() to
> finalise the port's flags.
>
> This patch obsoletes the #promise-sata-pata branch included
> in the #all branch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@xxxxxxxx>

applied patches 1-2 to #upstream.  minor follow-up comments follow in 
separate emails.

Thanks a bunch for working on this, sata_promise has needed some "love" 
for quite a while.

Any chance you could be talked to becoming "official" sata_promise 
maintainer, by sending in a patch to MAINTAINERS?

One open issue that remains is port enumeration order.  Bug reports 
consistently indicate that the ports are numbered on the board (visible 
to the naked eye) in a different manner than how the chip enumerates 
each port.  According to the bug reports, Promise's driver enumerates 
the ports in the correct order.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/