RE: [PATCH] x86_64 ioapic: check_timer_pin Don't add_pin_to_irqif it is already there.

From: Lu, Yinghai
Date: Mon Jan 08 2007 - 17:56:49 EST


-----Original Message-----
From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Linus Torvalds; Tobias Diedrich; Adrian Bunk; Andi Kleen; Linux
Kernel Mailing List; Lu, Yinghai
Subject: [PATCH] x86_64 ioapic: check_timer_pin Don't add_pin_to_irq if
it is already there.

>Yep. My oversight. Here is the trivial patch to fix it. I don't
>see how we could hit this case but if we are going to allow for it
>we should handle it correctly.

Yes, in your check_timer calling sequence, at that point irq can not be
0.
( remove_irq_to_pin already remove that entry).

Or in check_timer_pin

+ if ((irq != -1) && (irq != 0)) {

==>

+ if (irq != -1) {

YH



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/