Re: libata error handling

[Robert Hancock]

Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what
> > > made me try it), and from initial observations, that appears to be very
> > > true, however, im wondering, is there something i can do to get
> > > extremely verbose information from libata? for example if it corrects
> > > errors? cause i'd really like to know if it still happens, and if i
> > > perhaps get corruption as before, even though not severe.
> > Any errors, timeouts or retries would be showing up in dmesg..
> how sure can i be of this? is it 100% sure that i have not encountered
> this error then?

Pretty sure, I'm quite certain libata never does any silent error recovery..

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/