Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down

From: Stephen Hemminger
Date: Wed Dec 20 2006 - 18:52:38 EST


On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:37:41 -0800
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > There are two different problems:
> >
> > 1) Behavior seems to be different depending on device driver
> > author. We should document the expected semantics better.
> >
> > IMHO:
> > When device is down, it should:
> > a) use as few resources as possible:
> > - not grab memory for buffers
> > - not assign IRQ unless it could get one
> > - turn off all power consumption possible
> > b) allow setting parameters like speed/duplex/autonegotiation,
> > ring buffers, ... with ethtool, and remember the state
> > c) not accept data coming in, and drop packets queued
>
> What implications does c have for something like tcpdump?
>
> rick jones

None, you can bring up the device without actually assigning an address to it.

--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/