[PATCH 2.6.19] Do not always end the stack trace with ULONG_MAX
From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Tue Dec 12 2006 - 05:58:10 EST
It makes more sense to end the stack trace with ULONG_MAX only if
nr_entries < max_entries. Otherwise, we lose one entry in the long
stack traces and cannot know whether the trace was complete or not.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 6026b31..65ac2c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static void save_stack_address(void *data, unsigned long addr)
trace->skip--;
return;
}
- if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries - 1)
+ if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = addr;
}
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ static struct stacktrace_ops save_stack_ops = {
void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace, struct task_struct *task)
{
dump_trace(task, NULL, NULL, &save_stack_ops, trace);
- trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
+ if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
+ trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(save_stack_trace);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/