Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
From: David Howells
Date: Mon Dec 11 2006 - 06:05:22 EST
Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes you can. Well, you can on ARM at least. Between the load exclusive
> you can do anything you like until you hit the store exclusive.
How come atomic_set() on arm6 is implemented as:
static inline void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
{
unsigned long tmp;
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic_set\n"
"1: ldrex %0, [%1]\n"
" strex %0, %2, [%1]\n"
" teq %0, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
: "=&r" (tmp)
: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (i)
: "cc");
}
Why LDREX/STREX and not direct assignment?
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/