Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] fbmem: is bootup logo broken for monochrome LCD ?

From: Franck Bui-Huu
Date: Thu Nov 23 2006 - 09:55:04 EST


On 11/22/06, James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Replace the below line in my patch I sent

> > val |= color << shift;

with
val <<= shift;
val |= color;

I think it can't work since shift is 0 to 31, you'll end up with 'val
<<= 31' which I don't think is what you want.

doing
val <<= 1;

make it works but it's still very fragile. Code which deals with
trailing bit seems bogus since new value of 'val' is simply discarded
here.

/* write trailing bits */
if (shift) {
u32 end_mask = (~(u32)0 << shift);

val = FB_READL(dst1);
val &= end_mask;
FB_WRITEL(val, dst1);
}

Another thing is that I don't see how very small images (for example
when image->width = 4) will be handled.

> > /* Did the bitshift spill bits to the next long? */
> > if (shift >= 31) {
> > FB_WRITEL(val, dst++);
> > val = (shift == 31) ? 0 :(color >> (32 - shift));
> > }
> > shift += 1;
> > shift &= (32 - 1);
> > }
> >
> > [ ...]

Let me know if that works.

I'm wondering if working with 32 bits words really worth... I mean the
code is quite hard to follow because it needs to deal with endianess,
heading bits, trailings bits whereas working with 8 bits would be so
much easier, wouldn't it ? Are writings in video RAM very long ?

--
Franck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/