Re: [2.6.19 patch] i386/x86_64: remove the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_trace)

From: Vara Prasad
Date: Wed Nov 22 2006 - 02:41:28 EST


Alan wrote:

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:18:44 +0000
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 08:47:30PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:


On Tuesday 21 November 2006 20:41, Adrian Bunk wrote:


This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_trace) added on i386
and x86_64 in 2.6.19-rc.

By removing them before the final 2.6.19 we avoid the possibility of
people later whining that we removed exports they started using.


I exported it for systemtap so that they can stop using the broken
hack they currently use as unwinder.


Nack, dump_trace is nothing that should be export for broken out of tree
junk.



It is exported for systemtap not random broken out of tree junk, and the
result is a good deal prettier. Systemtap guys really ought to get their
stuff merged too, although how we merge a dynamic module writing tool I'm
not so sure ?



As you all know SystemTap uses kprobes and relayfs as the basis which are already merged into the mainline.
We are looking at all the other pieces of SystemTap that can be merged to mainline but as Alan mentioned it is not easy and obvious. We think we can merge transport part of the runtime, here is the initial patch under review in this thread
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/systemtap/2006-q4/msg00031.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/systemtap/2006-q4/msg00030.html

We are open for other suggestions as well.

bye,
Vara Prasad

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/