Re: [patch] cpufreq: mark cpufreq_tsc() as core_initcall_sync

[Alan Stern]

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> > Things may not be quite as bad as they appear.  On many architectures the
> > store-mb-load pattern will work as expected.  (In fact, I don't know which
> > architectures it might fail on.)
> 
> Several weak-memory-ordering CPUs.  :-/

Of the CPUs supported by Linux, do you know which ones will work with
store-mb-load and which ones won't?

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/