Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, 19 November 2006 20:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > > because people point to the suspend-to-disk instead.
> > 
> > Who they?
> 
> Like you _just_ did.

No, I didn't.  It was referred to in the message that started this thread.

I don't remeber telling _anyone_ not to use the STR and use the STD instead.

> > >  - enable PM_DEBUG, and PM_TRACE
> > 
> > This only works on i386, no?
> 
> Right now the trivial functions are only available on i386, yes. The 
> concept works anywhere that has a CMOS chip, so if somebody were to spend 
> a few minutes testing it on x86-64 and others, it would work elsewhere 
> too..

I can do that if someone gives me the code.

> > I don't know of anyone who's doing that.
> 
> I know. I'm probably the only one. Frustrating.

Well, it isn't that well documented ...

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
		R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/