Re: qstor driver -> irq 193: nobody cared

From: Alberto Alonso
Date: Fri Nov 17 2006 - 16:42:47 EST


FYI: trying with just the first patch didn't work. I got
the usual:

irq 185: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
<c013e19a> __report_bad_irq+0x2a/0xa0 <c013d970> handle_IRQ_event
+0x30/0x70
<c013e2b0> note_interrupt+0x80/0xf0 <c013da8c> __do_IRQ+0xdc/0xf0
<c0105799> do_IRQ+0x19/0x30 <c010391a> common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
<c0100d91> default_idle+0x41/0x70 <c0100e60> cpu_idle+0x80/0x90
handlers:
[<c0301300>] (qs_intr+0x0/0x230)
Disabling IRQ #185

Interestingly enough this is the first time I see it outside
of irq 193, not that it matter though.

I am going to try now with the second patch instead.

Alberto


On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 08:53 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> Alberto Alonso wrote:
> > Sorry for the long delay, I've been called on too
> > many issues at work this week.
> >
> > Anyway, the patch basically made the drives not usable.
>
> Mmm.. Okay, thanks for helping track this down.
>
> It appears that this got broken when the ATA_TFLAG_POLLING
> got introduced into libata, replacing previous checks of ATA_NIEN.
> Or maybe even before that. Not many of us have qstor cards!
>
> Speaking of which, I'll dig my own qstor card out of mothballs soon,
> and work out a proper fix for it soon-ish.
>
> In the meanwhile, could you take a clean kernel, and apply the first
> attached patch (qstor_spurious_1.patch), and see if it fixes things.
>
> If not, then you can instead apply the second patch (qstor_spurious_kludge.patch)
> and your problems should disappear. But I cannot actually push that rubbish
> upstream, so a "proper" fix will have to come later.
>
> Cheers
--
Alberto Alonso Global Gate Systems LLC.
(512) 351-7233 http://www.ggsys.net
Hardware, consulting, sysadmin, monitoring and remote backups

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/