Re: [patch] sched: optimize activate_task for RT task - v2

[Mike Galbraith]

On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 08:00 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> Personally, I think it's best to leave it as it is.  With that change,
> if someone changes policy while the task is waiting to get cpu, it will
> be requeued, and the on-runqueue bonus logic will then end up using
> wildly inaccurate information.

Bah, that's inverted.  interactive_sleep() will never be true after a
rt->non-rt policy change while enqueued with your change, so on-runqueue
bonus will be disabled where it otherwise might have been enabled.  Not
terribly interesting in any case given the likelihood, but still...

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/