Re: [PATCH 1/13] BC: atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() helper

[Cedric Le Goater]

Hello Kirill, Hello Pavel,

Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> Oleg Nesterov noticed to me that the construction like
> (used in beancounter patches and free_uid()):
> 
>   local_irq_save(flags);
>   if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&refcnt, &lock))
> 	  ...
> 
> is not that good for preemtible kernels, since with preemption
> spin_lock() can schedule() to reduce latency. However, it won't schedule
> if interrupts are disabled.
> 
> So this patch introduces atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() as a logical
> counterpart to atomic_dec_and_lock().

You should probably send that one independently from the BC 
patchset. 

C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/