Re: [patch 02/19] hrtimers: clean up callback tracking

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 23:38 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> plain text document attachment
> (hrtimers-clean-up-callback-tracking.patch)
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reintroduce ktimers feature "optimized away" by the ktimers review process:
> remove the curr_timer pointer from the cpu-base and use the hrtimer state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/include/linux/hrtimer.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1.orig/include/l
> -		if (unlikely(base->cpu_base->curr_timer == timer))
> +		if (unlikely(timer->state & HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK))
>  			return base;

this also could use the hrtimer_is_running() inline from the [01/19]
review


otherwise looks ok:

Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/