Re: New filesystem for Linux

[Mikulas Patocka]

> > > And possibly some broken drives may also return you something that
> > > they think is good data but really is not (shouldn't happen since
> > > both disks and cables should be protected by checksums, but hey...
> > > you can never be absolutely sure especially on very big storages).
>
> It happens because
> -	There is limited if any protection on the PCI bus generally
> -	Many PC systems don't have ECC memory, ECC cache
> -	PATA does not CRC protect the command block so if you do enough PATA
> I/O (eg you are a US national lab ..) you *will* eventually get a bit
> flip that gives you the wrong sector with no error data. SATA fixes that
> one.
> -	Murphy is out to get you..

Should IDE driver read back parameters after writing them before issuing 
the command? That should fix this problem. (except when command is written 
badly)

> Not seen that, although they do move stuff aorund in their internal
> block management of bad blocks. I've also seen hardware errors that lead
> to data being messed up silently.

I have seen one WD drive bought in 2003 having error in its firmware in 
cache-coherency code --- if you read and write 256 sectors to the same 
places with some pattern repeatedly (with direct IO), it will discard a 
write. It happens only with 256-sector writes, maybe some part of firmware 
treats 256 as 0. Maybe I create testcase sometimes.

Mikulas

> Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/