Re: New filesystem for Linux

From: Mikulas Patocka
Date: Fri Nov 03 2006 - 13:15:37 EST




On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Oleg Verych wrote:

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 06:09:39PM +0100, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
In gmane.linux.kernel, you wrote:
[]
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>

As Mikulas points out, (1 << anything) won't be evaluating to zero.

How about integer overflow ?

C standard defines that shifts by more bits than size of a type are
undefined (in fact 1<<32 produces 1 on i386, because processor uses only 5
bits of a count).
,--
|#include <stdio.h>
|int main(void) {
| unsigned int b = 1;
|
| printf("%u\n", (1 << 33));
| printf("%u\n", (b << 33));
| return 0;
|}
|$ gcc bit.c && ./a.out
`--

There *is* difference, isn't it?

The standard says that the result is undefined, so the compiler is standard-compliant. It could have returned any numbers and still be correct.

Mikulas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/