Re: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

From: Evgeniy Polyakov
Date: Thu Nov 02 2006 - 01:34:45 EST


On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 06:12:41PM -0800, Nate Diller (nate.diller@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Indesiciveness has certainly been an issue here, but I remember akpm
> and Ulrich both giving concrete suggestions. I was particularly
> interested in Andrew's request to explain and justify the differences
> between kevent and BSD's kqueue interface. Was there a discussion
> that I missed? I am very interested to see your work on this
> mechanism merged, because you've clearly emphasized performance and
> shown impressive results. But it seems like we lose out on a lot by
> throwing out all the applications that already use kqueue.

It looks you missed that discussion - freebsd kqueue has fields in the
kevent structure which have diffent sizes in 32 and 64 bit environments.

> NATE

--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/