Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

[Gianluca Alberici]

Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:

> I'm confused on the discussion:
> legal? I don't find how a windo$e driver can be "derived work" of Linux,
> and anyway they use a "standard" interface. So it is acceptable for GPL
> (IMHO and IANAL). so it is not a legal problem.
>
> I see only a development question:
> should we allow untrusted module to know and modify the
> "intimate" part of kernel, and cause compability and other large
> amount of problems into kernel developers, distribution and users?
I really cannot see even a political problem. I the case of ndiswrapper 
the problem is not whether we want to support windows or whatever 
drivermodules, but if we want to support NDIS drivers with a GPL wrapper.

regards,

Gianluca

> So it is a political question, not a legal question!
>
> ciao
>     cate
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/