Re: [PATCH] IPIC: Don't call set_irq_handler with desc->lock held.

From: Kumar Gala
Date: Wed Oct 25 2006 - 01:41:46 EST



On Oct 23, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Scott Wood wrote:

This patch causes ipic_set_irq_type to set the handler directly rather
than call set_irq_handler, which causes spinlock recursion because
the lock is already held when ipic_set_irq_type is called.

I'm also not convinced that ipic_set_irq_type should be changing the
handler at all. There seem to be several controllers that don't and
several that do. Those that do would break what appears to be a common
usage of calling set_irq_chip_and_handler followed by set_irq_type, if a
non-standard handler were to be used. OTOH, irq_create_of_mapping()
doesn't set the handler, but only calls set_irq_type().

This patch gets things working in the spinlock-debugging-enabled case,
but I'm curious as to where the handler setting is ideally supposed to be
done. I don't see any documentation on set_irq_type() that clarifies
what the semantics are supposed to be.

Guys, Scott pointed this problem out on a PPC interrupt controller, and wanted to raise it in a larger forum since it appears to exist on at least one ARM interrupt controller I looked at (ixp4xx). What is the proper solution to handle this.

The callers of set_type() I found all grab desc->lock.

- kumar


Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c
index bc4d4a7..746f78c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c
@@ -473,9 +473,9 @@ static int ipic_set_irq_type(unsigned in
desc->status |= flow_type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
if (flow_type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW) {
desc->status |= IRQ_LEVEL;
- set_irq_handler(virq, handle_level_irq);
+ desc->handle_irq = handle_level_irq;
} else {
- set_irq_handler(virq, handle_edge_irq);
+ desc->handle_irq = handle_edge_irq;
}

/* only EXT IRQ senses are programmable on ipic
--
1.4.2.3

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/