Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions

[Adrian Bunk]

On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 01:24:54PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 01:14:58PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > As usual, we are swamped with bug reports for regressions after -rc1.
> > 
> > For an easier reading (and hoping linux-kernel might not eat the emails), 
> > I've splitted the list of known regressions in three emails:
> >   [1/3] known unfixed regressions
> >   [2/3] knwon regressions with workarounds
> >   [3/3] known regressions with patches
> 
> There's a raft of ARM regressions as well (see
> http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/kautobuild/2.6.19-rc2/index.html), mostly
> related to the IRQ changes, as well as this error:

Thanks, I'll look at them before preparing the next version of my 
regressions list.

> sysctl_net.c:(.text+0x64a8c): undefined reference to `highest_possible_node_id'

This problem already got an entry a few hours ago:

Subject    : undefined reference to highest_possible_node_id
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/4/233
             http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/15/11
Submitter  : Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
Caused-By  : Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
             commit 0f532f3861d2c4e5aa7dcd33fb18e9975eb28457
Status     : unknown

> Russell King

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/