Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers

[Jan Engelhardt]

>> > > %p will do no such thing in the kernel.  As for the difference...
>> > > %x
>> > > might happen to work on some architectures (where sizeof(void
>> > > *)==sizeof(int)),
>> > > but it's not portable _and_ not right.  %p is proper C for that...
>> 
>> Ah I see your point, but then again, %lx could have been used. Unless
>> there is some arch where sizeof(long) != sizeof(void *).
>
> That really makes gcc bitch, *and* it's wrong for a whole bunch of reasons.

Ah my bad. Thanks for the slap reminder. :)


	-`J'
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/