Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers

[Jan Engelhardt]

>> %p will do no such thing in the kernel.  As for the difference...  %x
>> might happen to work on some architectures (where sizeof(void
>> *)==sizeof(int)),
>> but it's not portable _and_ not right.  %p is proper C for that...

Ah I see your point, but then again, %lx could have been used. Unless 
there is some arch where sizeof(long) != sizeof(void *).

> It's really too bad gcc bitches about %#p, because that's arguably The Right
> Thing.

ack. Make a bug report perhaps?

	-`J'
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/