Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers

From: Jan Engelhardt
Date: Wed Oct 11 2006 - 07:19:19 EST



>diff --git a/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c b/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c
>index ddc0681..b30372f 100644
>--- a/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c
>+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c
>@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static int __init ts102_uctrl_init(void)
> }
>
> driver->regs->uctrl_intr = UCTRL_INTR_RXNE_REQ|UCTRL_INTR_RXNE_MSK;
>- printk("uctrl: 0x%x (irq %d)\n", driver->regs, driver->irq);
>+ printk("uctrl: 0x%p (irq %d)\n", driver->regs, driver->irq);

So what's the difference, except that %p will evaluate to (nil) or
(null) when the argument is 0 [this is the case with glibc]?
That would print 0x(nil).


-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/