Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Generic container system

From: Paul Menage
Date: Wed Oct 04 2006 - 17:43:13 EST


On 10/4/06, Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All of this (and the rest of the snipped email with suggested
> improvements) makes pretty good sense. But would it not be better
> to do this in stages?
>
> 1) Split the code out from cpusets

Paul (Menage) is already work on this.

The split out is done - right now I'm tidying up an example of RG
moved over the container API - basically dumping the group membership
code (since container.c supplies that) and migrating the shares/stats
file model to containerfs rather than configfs. I'll try to send it
out today.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/