Re: [PATCH 0/5] Message signaled irq handling cleanups

[Eric W. Biederman]

ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> The following patch set should be enough to clear up the
> outstanding issues with genirq on i386 and x86_64.  This actually
> takes things a step farther and moves all of architecture
> dependencies I could find into the appropriate architecture.
>
> So hopefully we are finally close enough that other architectures
> will be able implement msi support, without too much trouble.
>
> msi: Simplify msi sanity checks by adding with generic irq code.
> msi: Only use a single irq_chip for msi interrupts
> msi: Refactor and move the msi irq_chip into the arch code.
> msi: Move the ia64 code into arch/ia64
> htirq: Tidy up the htirq code
>
> Eric

Grr.. My ia64 compiler is way too slow.  It just told me I had some
trivial bugs in the altix portion of what I posted.   Sorry I forgot
to mention all I can do is compile test ia64.

So here comes a second time with code that actually compiles :)

Darn this code that is so ugly that you have to test the cleanup on
multiple architectures!

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/