Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18

From: Robin Getz
Date: Wed Sep 27 2006 - 12:26:32 EST


Arnd wrote:
Ok, looks good now. Just a few details that don't impact the
functionality:

[snip]

What I committed (to our source) is:

+++ process.c 27 Sep 2006 15:32:46 -0000 1.42
@@ -101,10 +101,10 @@
{
while (!need_resched()) {
leds_switch(LED_OFF);
- __asm__("nop;\n\t \
- nop;\n\t \
- nop;\n\t \
- idle;\n\t": : :"cc");
+ local_irq_disable();
+ if (likely( !need_resched()))
+ idle_with_irq_disabled();
+ local_irq_enable();
leds_switch(LED_ON);
}
}

And in system.h, this was added (because this is where all the other inlines is which messes with the interrupts are - and irq_flags is already defined here)

+++ system.h 27 Sep 2006 15:32:51 -0000 1.24

+#define idle_with_irq_disabled() do { \
+ __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
+ "nop; nop;\n" \
+ ".align 8;\n" \
+ "sti %0; idle;\n" \
+ ::"d" (irq_flags)); \
+} while (0)

It seems to work OK.

Thanks for your help on this.

I think we have been weeding through everyone's comments, and have most things fixed up.

Are there any other major issues that you can see (that have not been pointed out).

-Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/