Re: [PATCH] libata-sff: use our IRQ defines

[Jeff Garzik]

Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Maw, 2006-09-26 am 22:44 +0200, ysgrifennodd Olivier Galibert:
> > >  		if (probe_ent->irq)
> > > -			probe_ent->irq2 = 15;
> > > +			probe_ent->irq2 = ATA_SECONDARY_IRQ;
> > >  		else
> > >  			probe_ent->irq = 15;
> > Isn't that one supposed to be ATA_SECONDARY_IRQ too?
> >
> > >  		probe_ent->port[1].cmd_addr = ATA_SECONDARY_CMD;
>
> Duh yes...
>
> (adds another paper bag to the pile)

committed obvious fix...


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/