Re: Linux

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Mon Sep 25 2006 - 04:15:35 EST


> > > And my rules are:
> > > - patch must be in Linus' tree
> > > - I'm asking the patch authors and maintainers of the affected subsystem
> > > whether the patch is OK for 2.6.16
> >
> > I thought stable rules were longer than this... including 'patch must
> > be < 100 lines' and 'must be bugfix for serious bug'. Changing rules
> > for -stable series in the middle of it seems like a bad idea...
> I stated what I'd do with 2.6.16 before I took over maintainance.

I do not remember you stating that
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt is obsolete, and that you'll
have your own version. Heh, I'm not sure greg understood that.
(cesky, pictures)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at