Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inodediet patch

[Eric Sandeen]

Andrew Morton wrote:

> > So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the
> > one above).
>
> eh?  Eric's patch is based on -mm, which includes the XFS git tree.  If I
> go and merge the inode-diet patches from -mm, XFS gets broken until you
> guys merge the above mystery patch.  (I prefer to merge the -mm patches
> after all the git trees have gone, but sometimes maintainers dawdle and I
> get bored of waiting).
>
> Is git://oss.sgi.com:8090/nathans/xfs-2.6 obsolete, or are you hiding stuff
> from me?  ;)
well it's in cvs:

http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.254&r2=text&tr2=1.253&f=h

but I'm too lazy to check git on a friday evening. :)

Well, sgi-guys, I'll let you sort out which patch you want.  Sorry for not 
checking cvs first!

-Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/