Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans

[Dave Jones]

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:29:21PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
 > 
 > NOTE:  Your mailer generates bogus Mail-Followup-To headers, and you 
 > snipped rmk from the To/CC.

Hmm, curious. I'll file a bug. 

 > > Has Andrew commented on why this is proving to be more of a problem?
 > > I've done regular rebases of cpufreq/agpgart (admittedly, they don't
 > > reject hardly ever unless Len has ACPI bits touching cpufreq) without
 > > causing too much headache.
 > 
 > Rebasing _inevitably_ causes more headaches than a simple tree update, 
 > for any downstream consumer of your tree(s).  It is best to avoid wanton 
 > rebasing.
 
Sorry, terminology confusion. I rarely throw away a tree and start afresh,
I meant of course just updating to linus' latest.  This may explain the
my lack of understanding over Russell's issues.

	Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/