Re: [KJ] kmalloc to kzalloc patches for drivers/block [sane version]

[Paulo Marques]

Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 9/22/06, Paulo Marques <pmarques@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Agreed on every comment except this one. That complex expression is
> > really just a constant in the end, so there is no point in using kcalloc.
>
> The code is arguably easier to read with kcalloc.

I was afraid the kcalloc call would have the added overhead of an extra 
parameter and a multiplication, but since it is actually declared as a 
static inline, gcc should optimize everything away (because both 
parameters are constants) and give the same result in the end.

So, its fine by me either way.

--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com

"The face of a child can say it all, especially the
mouth part of the face."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/