Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)

From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:54:43 EST


* Mathieu Desnoyers (compudj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar (mingo@xxxxxxx) wrote:
>
> > "As an example, LTTng traces the page fault handler, when kprobes just
> > can't instrument it."
> >
> > but tracing a raw pagefault at the arch level is a bad idea anyway, we
> > want to trace __handle_mm_fault(). That way you can avoid having to
> > modify every architecture's pagefault handler ...
> >
>
> Then you lose the ability to trace in-kernel minor page faults.
>
But I agree with you that an upstream MARKER makes more sense in
__handle_mm_fault(). :-)

Regards,

Mathieu

OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/