Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

[Karim Yaghmour]

Alan Cox wrote:
> In the meantime perhaps the saner members of the static trace brigade
> can explain why gcc debug data isn't good enough for them when its good
> enough for kgdb to do single stepping at source level and variable
> printing ?

Care to explain how I can use to implement the equivalent of this:

@@ -1709,6 +1712,7 @@ switch_tasks:
   		++*switch_count;

   		prepare_arch_switch(rq, next);
+		TRACE_SCHEDCHANGE(prev, next);
   		prev = context_switch(rq, prev, next);
   		barrier();

Also, care to explain how kprobes can be used to access same data
without having to actually customize a probe point for every binary?

Thanks,

Karim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/