Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
From: Roman Zippel
Date: Thu Sep 14 2006 - 09:41:53 EST
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i have one very fundamental question: why should we do this
> source-intrusive method of adding tracepoints instead of the dynamic,
> unintrusive (and thus zero-overhead) KProbes+SystemTap method?
Could you define "zero-overhead"?
Actual implementation aside having a core number of tracepoints is far
more portable than KProbes.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/