Re: [-mm patch] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c

[Frederik Deweerdt]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:07:35PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> 
> > Yes it does, but the intended use of 'func' (or so I understood) is to
> > print the calling function name, not the current function's, isn't it?
> 
> Dunno, I took it to mean the current function from the context of that
> patch.  I could be wrong, of course.
I've just checked, this are some of the callers of
vfp_single_normaliseround (last argument is 'func'):

in vfp_single_fuito: 
	vfp_single_normaliseround(sd, &vs, fpscr, 0, "fuito");
in vfp_single_fsito:
	vfp_single_normaliseround(sd, &vs, fpscr, 0, "fsito");
in vfp_single_fnmul:
	vfp_single_normaliseround(sd, &vsd, fpscr, exceptions, "fnmul");

It definitely looks like we want the calling function to be printed
here.

Regards,
Frederik

> 
> - z
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/